Showing posts with label таблица смертности. Show all posts
Showing posts with label таблица смертности. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Missing twins and twin-singleton mortality convergence in Sub-Saharan Africa

Published on N-IUSSP.ORG February 3, 2020

Roland Pongou, David Shapiro, Michel Tenikue

Substantial literature documents that twins have higher mortality than singletons, but does not address whether this twin disadvantage eventually disappears, and if so, at what age. Roland Pongou, David Shapiro and Michel Tenikue find that mortality differences in sub-Saharan Africa narrow with age, and that convergence occurs by age 6. Over time, mortality of both twins and singletons has declined, but the disadvantage of twins has persisted. Their analysis implies that over 100 million twins – almost half of the world’s twin population – are currently missing, and that this situation originates very early in life.


Twin-singleton mortality differences at early ages are an important source of child inequality in all societies. Owing to the unfavorable fetal conditions of twins resulting in growth retardation and low birthweight, their risk of death within the first year of life is significantly higher than that of singletons by a factor ranging from 3.5 times in Gambia (Miyahara et al. 2016) to 5 in the United Kingdom (ONS 2012) and in Sweden (Cheung, Yip, and Karlberg 2000), and 6 in the United States (Almond, Chay, and Lee 2005). This gap is also observed in all sub-Saharan African countries (Pongou 2013; Smits and Monden 2011).

These mortality inequalities mean that a large number of twins are missing. In 2006 there were about 125 million individuals in the world who had been born as twins (Oliver 2006). This figure represents about 1.6% of the world population, far below the proportion of twin births in most societies, which is around 3% (Pison, Monden, and Smits 2015; Smits and Monden 2011; Monden and Smits 2017). These figures indicate that at least 100 million twins – almost half of the twin population – are missing.

This raises the question of how long the twin-singleton difference in mortality rates persists as children age. Using individual-level data from 99 Demographic and Health Surveys collected in 34 sub-Saharan African countries between 1990 and 2013, we documented twin-singleton mortality differences from birth to age 25. A total of about 3 million births are recorded in the data, of which 3.2% are twins (1.7% twin deliveries). These proportions are comparable to those found in the United States and many European countries (Almond, Chay, and Lee 2005; Pison, Monden, and Smits 2015; Smits and Monden 2011).

We consider that mortality converges when the difference between twin and singleton mortality rates falls below 2 per 1000 and remains below this value as children age (the Millennium Development Goal target of child mortality for developed countries was 5 per 1000).

Higher twin mortality, especially in the first year of life


Figure 1 displays mortality rates in sub-Saharan Africa by age in months for the first year of life. Twins have lower survival throughout their first year of life, with the differences being especially marked in the first few months. Mortality of twins is nearly five times as high as that of singletons in the first month, presumably due to a greater incidence of biological problems (e.g., birth defects) among twins. The ratio of twin to singleton mortality rates decreases almost monotonically from about 5 in the first month to about 3 in the next few months, reaching 1.7 in the 12th month.



Mortality of twins and singletons in sub-Saharan Africa by age in years is shown in Figure 2. The difference is substantial in the first year, but it diminishes as age increases. The mortality of twins is more than 3 times that of singletons during the first year of life, but this factor falls to 1.7 and 1.4 in years 2 and 3, respectively. By age 5, the twin-singleton mortality difference has fallen to 2 per 1000. From age 6, the difference falls to 1 per 1000 or zero, and remains very low up through the early 20s (Pongou, Shapiro, and Tenikue 2019).


Cohort trends in mortality and survival of twins and singletons


We used data collected since 1990 from women aged 15-49 at the time of the survey to analyze time trends in the twin-singleton mortality difference. The data provide detailed information on births that date back more than 34 years prior to the survey, allowing us to monitor mortality over time.

Figure 3 displays the survival of twins and singletons in sub-Saharan Africa by decade of birth (1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010-2013). It shows that survival has improved for both twins and singletons over the years. Also, the twin-singleton mortality difference has narrowed, but the higher mortality of twins has persisted. For example, in infancy, when children are at their highest mortality risk, a twin’s risk of dying was 30-percentage points higher than that of a singleton in the 1960s, about 20 points higher in the 1970s to 1990s, and only 15 points higher after the year 2000.


Conclusion


When we examine twin-singleton differences in mortality risk up to age 25 in sub-Saharan Africa, we find an important difference in the first year of life. This difference decreases with age, however, and practically disappears after age 5. After the age of 6, annual mortality risk is very low for all children (fewer than 5 deaths per 1000 children overall). This might be explained by both a selection effect, because the most vulnerable children died before age 5, and the fact that many children are already immunized for some infectious diseases and are less vulnerable to health problems when they reach that age. Our study is the first to analyze mortality convergence between twins and singletons, yielding new insights into how mortality inequalities change across ages.

References


  • Almond, D., Chay, K.Y., and Lee, D.S. (2005). The costs of low birth weight. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(3): 1031–1083.
  • Cheung Y.B., Yip, P. and J. Karlberg, J. (2000). Mortality of twins and singletons by gestational age: A varying-coefficient approach. American Journal of Epidemiology 152(12): 1107-1116.
  • Miyahara R., Jasseh, M., Mackenzie, G.A., Bottomley, C., Hossain, M.J., Greenwood, B.M., D’Alessandro, U., and Roca, A. (2016). The large contribution of twins to neonatal and post-neonatal mortality in The Gambia, a 5-year prospective study. BMC Pediatrics 16:39.
  • Monden, C. and Smits, J. (2017). Mortality among twins and singletons in sub-Saharan Africa between 1995 and 2014: a pooled analysis of data from 90 Demographic and Health Surveys in 30 countries. Lancet Global Health5(7), PE673-E679.
  • Office for National Statistics (ONS). (2012). Live births, stillbirths and infant deaths, Babies Born in 2009 in England and Wales Statistical Bulletin.
  • Oliver, J. (2006). Twin resources. Swindon, UK: Economic and Social Research Council.
  • Pison, G., Monden, C., and Smits, J. (2015). Twinning rates in developed countries: Trends and explanations. Population and Development Review 41(4): 629–649.
  • Pongou R. (2013). Why is infant mortality higher in boys than in girls? A new hypothesis based on preconception environment and evidence from a large sample of twins. Demography 50(2): 421-444.
  • Pongou, R., Shapiro, D., and Tenikue, M. (2019). Mortality convergence of twins and singletons in sub-Saharan Africa. Demographic Research 41(36): 1047-1058.
  • Smits, J. and Monden. C. (2011). Twinning across the developing world. PLoS ONE 6(9): e25239. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025239.
  • United Nations Children’s Fund. (2015). Levels & Trends in Child Mortality. Report 2015.

Wednesday, July 24, 2019

healthcare in the Soviet Union

How bad was the healthcare in the Soviet Union?

Vladimir Lebedev-Schmidthof, Born in the Soviet Union, live in Russia for all my life. Married, with kids.
Answered Jun 30
The first negative aspect is that it was free and universal.
[и первый, с порный, как и остальные, ваще гря, юмор наверно]

There were free birth clinics where our mothers gave birth to us. Newborn us were clothed and fed and vaccinated on the very first hour of our lives. This must be the second terrible thing.

The third terrible thing is that every child was personally watched by a local pediatrician as well as a nurse. If a child became sick, the mother called the clinic and the doctor came to the child.

The fourth terrible thing is that sick leaves for mothers were covered by the national insurance program.

The fifth absolutely horrible thing is that there were regular medical examinations in kindergartens and schools. A bunch of doctors examined children for various things. [диспансеризация]

The sixth thing is that there were also dentist examination and possible treatment. Not shiny as modern but it did work.

The same kind of examinations was made on all (or almost all) factories and other places of work. At least once a year, all personnel was examined by a team of doctors.

In 1971 (just for example) there were 697,800 doctors in the Soviet Union (Source: Народное хозяйство СССР), 2195000 nurses, 25800 hospitals with 2727000 places. Considering the Soviet Union population in 1971 as 243.9 million, there were 2.86 doctors per 1000 people.

Just as a comparison, the United States had some 1.5 doctors per 1000 people (according to the graph here: Physicians in the United States - Wikipedia)

After the breakaway of the Soviet Union, the average age started to shorten. Medicine is to blame. [видимо, имеет в иду продолжительность жизни, но не учтён факт её последующего роста, совмещённого с оптимизацией]

Ничего не было, по кр мере, не перечислено того, что касается пенсионного возраста.

Saturday, June 8, 2019

lex ru

Ожидаемая продолжительность жизни,
общий коэффициент смертности и младенческая смертность


Число лет предстоящей жизни для новорожденного

Число умерших на 1000 человек населения

Число умерших
в возрасте до
1 года на 1000 родившихся живыми

мужчины и женщины

мужчины

женщины

1896-1897гг.

30,54

29,43

31,69

33,3

322,0

1926-1927гг.

42,93

40,23

45,61

20,7

174,0

1958-1959гг.

67,91

62,99

71,45

7,4

41,1

1964-1965гг.

69,61

64,60

73,34

7,2

28,8

1974-1975гг.

68,60

62,78

73,41

9,2

22,8

1984-1985гг.

68,08

62,31

73,32

11,6

20,9

1986-1987гг.

70,13

64,91

74,55

10,4

19,3

1994г.

63,85

57,42

71,08

15,7

18,6

1998г.

67,07

61,22

73,13

13,6

16,5

2003г.

64,85

58,55

71,84

16,4

12,4

2004г.

65,27

58,89

72,30

16,0

11,6

2005г.

65,30

58,87

72,39

16,1

11,0

2006г.

66,60

60,37

73,23

15,2

10,2

источник: Росстат

источник: Демоскоп

Wednesday, April 3, 2019

sex ratio by age

ikashnitsky 11 октября 2016 в 23:07
Я тут запилил сравнительный график по всем странам Human Mortality Database, 2012 год.

Соотношение полов в зависимости от возраста
Не понял как даёт HMDB соотношение полов в населении?
скорее всего речь об lx,
но остаётся непонятно есть ли поправка на соотношение при рождении?
исправление будет в год/два — на кортинко и не видно
либо есть population at risk, но не пользовал — теперь буду знать

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

an unknown historical change

навстречу докладу Андреева, вчера Г. Ульянова поставила табличку с продолжительностью жизни
возникла дискуссия стоит ли пользовать е0 или е15, к примеру (в оригинале е10)
вот к примеру картинка:
перемещение разницы в старшие возраста
перемещение разницы LEX в старшие возраста (source)
но камент про здоровье: The conclusion is that the world developed from equally poor health in 1800, to great inequality in 1950, and back to more equality today – but equality at a much higher level. Если детей отрезать это движение выпадает из истории.

Thursday, June 28, 2018

population costs of a new retirement age

как-та-таг
Пащетал стоимость перехода на новый возраст: сколько заплатит население = сколько сэкономит "правительство". Данные по дожитию из статьи РБК со ссылкой на ин-те демографии ВШЭ, там написано:
Они сделаны на основе данных базы Human Mortality Database и сценария изменений в смертности, заложенного в средний (наиболее вероятный) вариант прогноза Росстата
Подозреваю, что вероятность смерти считалась по результатам прогноза, а не из таблиц смертности, то-есть, с учётом миграции. Как она учитывалась? — не знаю, не думаю, что после 40 она существенна, но х.з

Получилось что в группе риска чуть менее 13 млн чел, или практично каждый 10й, не доживет чуть менее 1/2 млн, и каждый из низ заплатит за недожитие около 1/4 млн
проверяйте !
agem yobto 60to retretpopaddiedlin10000period
5819590.9790.9586197912420562102811,233,696,2401,233,696,240
5719600.9590.91762108013745366226832,721,945,2405,443,890,480
5619610.9460.88963101182157674288373,460,427,82010,381,283,460
5519620.9310.8566497333273000365004,379,994,00017,519,976,000
5419630.9180.8266595070687465437325,247,897,12026,239,485,600
499512028406617,043,960,42060,818,331,780
f yob
5319640.9940.9895697912448962448293,737,200293,737,200
5219650.9900.97857979124117495875704,969,2801,409,938,560
5119660.9860.97058979124156667833939,959,0402,819,877,120
5019670.9820.962599791241958297911,174,948,8004,699,795,200
4919680.9790.9556097912423499117491,409,938,5607,049,692,800
4819690.9770.9496197912427415137081,644,928,3209,869,569,920
4719700.9750.9436297912431332156661,879,918,08013,159,426,560
4619710.9740.9356397912438186190932,291,150,16018,329,201,280
subtotals
783299217232610,339,549,44057,631,238,640
totals
12828112456392118,449,570,420
mean
259,535

сам ЩёТ, мб, и напортачил — comments are welcome

что значат столбики?
age - возраст
m yob, f yob - год рождения мущин и жанчын
to 60 - доля доживающих до 60
to ret - доля доживающих до нового возраста выхода на пенсию
ret - новый возраст выхода на пенсию
pop - численноость населения половозрастной группы
addied - число умерших, не дожывших до нового пенсионного возраста
lin - предположение, что умирать будут линейно
10000 - годовой расход населения/доход правительства, умножено на ср размер пенсии, тут могу поплыть (взят условно)
period - деньги за период перехода
что значат строчки?
subtotals - сумма по столбику
totals - сумма 2х столбиков
mean - средняя, сколько сэкономит праительство РФ на одном недожившем до нового пенсионного возраста
для сравнения

Monday, February 12, 2018

New: Human Mortality Database, Version 6

ну! что же тут поделаешь?
Dear HMD user,

You are receiving this message as a registered user of the Human Mortality Database. If you do not want to receive our newsletters, please inform us by sending a message to hmdunsubscribe@mortality.org to unsubscribe.

This is to let you know that we have modified some of the methods used to produce the HMD life tables. The new methods are explained in the revised version of the Methods Protocol (Version 6), available at http://www.mortality.org/Public/Docs/MethodsProtocol.pdf.

Compared to Version 5, Version 6 introduces two new methods, namely, 1) a more precise way to estimate a0, the mean age at death for children dying during the first year of life, and 2) the use of birth-by-month data (where and when available) to more accurately estimate population exposure s. For more details about these changes, see section 7.1 of the revised Methods Protocol on Period life tables and section 6 and Appendix E, on Death rates.

The V5 version of the data on the HMD website has been replaced with the V6 version on December 5, 2017. However, the latest series published under Version 5 of the Methods Protocol have been archived for all HMD countries and will remain available indefinitely (with no further updates) at v5.mortality.org.

Please also note that we have just published a renovated version of the Human Lifetable Database, or HLD (www.lifetable.de), which is also part of the HMD project. The Human Life-Table Database (HLD) is a collection of population life tables for a multitude of countries and sub-national populations covering many years produced by people outside of the HMD using diverse estimation methods. 

Sincerely,
 Vladimir Shkolnikov
Director, HMD


Hmdusers is a broadcast-only service. Replies to this message will not be read. Contact hmd@mortality.org with any questions. Requests to be dropped from the registration database should be sent to hmdunsubscribe@mortality.org